It is highly unlikely that the membership would have supported expulsion. Expulsion procedures weren't performed according to the law because the credit union did not want to upset the membership by having the many problems in revamping the online banking system formally presented in a membership expulsion hearing in which serious errors would be highlighted exposing the chaos and dispuption in this unorthodox transition. I received NO other notification regarding expulsion beyond their Dec 14th ex parte communication. 14: FEDERAL CREDIT UNIONS stipulates that I must be expelled by a 2/3 vote of credit union members NOT merely by the administrative actions documented in PenAir's Dec 14th letter or a 2/3 majority of the credit union's board.
(This gives the reader an idea of the immense power wielded against the average citizen by the banking consortium.) Having read NCUA's response letter and in particular the statement that they don't adjudicate facts between credit unions and a complainant brings to mind the question why bother to investigate anything? This policy means that any investigation is restricted to whether or not all the regulatory rules were followed and in my case the law was clearly not followed regarding the conditions of expulsion. This can now happen to anyone as a wave of fascism sweeps over America's Banks. This demonstates the growing trend of corporations to silence critics of their products, services or political philosophies. Lindell because of his 'reputational risk' (being conservative, what kind of a reason is this?!).
The second individual to be 'deplatforned' (that I'm aware of) by a financial institution is MIKE LINDELL Minnesota Bank & Trust, a subsidiary of Heartland Financial deplatformed Mr.
0 kommentar(er)
